Cor Vasa 2023, 65(5):729-734 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2023.054
Comparison of cyanoacrylate agents VariClose® and VenaSeal™ in the treatment of insufficient saphenous veins
- a Division of Vascular Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- b Cardiocentre, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- c Department of Vascular Surgery, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
- d Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the cyanoacrylate venous sealing systems VenaSeal™ and VariClose® in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency.
Methods: A single-centre retrospective analysis on patients treated between April 2018 and April 2022 with cyanoacrylate adhesives for lower limb superficial truncal vein insufficiency was performed.
Results: The VariClose® system was used in 27 patients (30 veins) and the VenaSeal™ system in 97 patients (125 veins). The median follow-up periods for patients treated with VariClose® and VenaSeal™ systems were 267 (IQR 223) and 201 (IQR 280) days, respectively. At one year, recanalization occurred in 11 veins treated with the VariClose® system and 5 veins treated with the VenaSeal™ system. The occlusion rates estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method at 30, 90, 180, and 360 days were 100%, 96%, 83%, and 42% for veins treated with the VariClose® system and 100%, 98%, 96%, and 91% for veins treated with the VenaSeal™ system (p <0.01).
Conclusions: The VenaSeal™ system had significantly better occlusion rates than the VariClose® system.
Keywords: Cyanoacrylate, VariClose®, Varicose veins, VenaSeal™ , Venous insufficiency
Received: February 17, 2023; Revised: June 14, 2023; Accepted: June 14, 2023; Published: October 15, 2023 Show citation
References
- De Maeseneer MG, Kakkos SK, Aherne T, et al. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022;63:184-267.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bozkurt AK, Lawaetz M, Danielson G, et al. European College of Phlebology guideline for truncal ablation. Phlebology 2020;35:73-83.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Almeida JI, Javier JJ, Mackay EG, et al. Thirty-sixth-month follow-up of first-in-human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017;5:658-666.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bissacco D, Stegher S, Calliari FM, Viani MP. Saphenous vein ablation with a new cyanoacrylate glue device: a systematic review on 1000 cases. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2019;28:6-14.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Balaz P, Rokosny S, Whitley A. VariClose® vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins. Vascular 2022;30:542-547.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Balaz P, Rokosny S, Herman J, et al. Experience with VariClose® vein sealing system in the Czech Republic. Phlebology 2022;37:105-111.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bozkurt AK, Yilmaz MF. A prospective comparison of a new cyanoacrylate glue and laser ablation for the treatment of venous insufficiency. Phlebology 2016;31(1 Suppl):106-113.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, et al. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg 2015;61:985-994.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Morrison N, Kolluri R, Vasquez M, et al. Comparison of cyanoacrylate closure and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins: 36-Month outcomes of the VeClose randomized controlled trial. Phlebology 2019;34:380-390.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Calik ES, Arslan U, Ayaz F, et al. N-butyl cyanoacrylate in the treatment of venous insufficiency--the effect of embolisation with ablative polymerisation. Vasa 2016;45:241-246.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Tekin AI, Tuncer ON, Memetoglu ME, et al. Nonthermal, Nontumescent Endovenous Treatment of Varicose Veins. Ann Vasc Surg 2016;36:231-235.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Koramaz I, El Kilic H, Gokalp F, et al. Ablation of the great saphenous vein with nontumescent n-butyl cyanoacrylate versus endovenous laser therapy. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017;5:210-215.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Tok M, Tuydes O, Yuksel A, et al. Early-Term Outcomes for Treatment of Saphenous Vein Insufficiency with N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate: A Novel, Non-Thermal, and Non-Tumescent Percutaneous Embolization Technique. Heart Surg Forum 2016;19:E118-E122.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Eroglu E, Yasim A, Ari M, et al. Mid-term results in the treatment of varicose veins with N-butyl cyanoacrylate. Phlebology 2017;32:665-669.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bademci MS, Tayfur K, Ocakoglu G, et al. A new percutaneous technique: N-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive for the treatment of giant saphenous vein insufficiency. Vascular 2018;26:194-197.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Proebstle TM, Alm J, Dimitri S, et al. The European multicenter cohort study on cyanoacrylate embolization of refluxing great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2015;3:2-7.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Proebstle T, Alm J, Dimitri S, et al. Three-year follow-up results of the prospective European Multicenter Cohort Study on Cyanoacrylate Embolization for treatment of refluxing great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021;9:329-334.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.