Cor Vasa 2020, 62(1):37-43 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2020.003

A second look at autopericardial mitral annuloplasty

Abubakari I. Sidiki^a, Alexandr G. Faybushevich^b, Alexandr N. Lishchuk^c

^a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, People's Friendship University of Russia (RUDN-University), Moscow, Russia

^b Department of Surgery, People's Friendship University of Russia (RUDN-University), Moscow, Russia

^c Cardiovascular Center, FSBI 3 Central Vishnevsky Hospital, Moscow, Russia

Objective: To compare total pericardial mitral annuloplasty (PeMA) and total prosthetic mitral annuloplasty (PrMA) in terms of durability in the treatment of degenerative, ischemic functional and non-ischemic functional mitral regurgitation (MR).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of 280 patients who received either PeMA (50.4%) or PrMA (with Carpentier-Edwards Physio rings; 49.6%) after valvuloplasty between 2008 and 2015. Combined procedures included: 40 CABG (PeMA - 18, PrMA - 22); 13 ablations with left atrial appendectomy (PrMA - 8, PrMA - 5); 7 tricuspid valve repairs (PeMA - 2, PrMA - 5); 9 closures of atrial septal defect (PeMA - 3, PrMA - 6).

Results: Thirty-day mortality was 0.4%. Mean follow-up was 95.7% complete at 83.4 ± 13.0 months. The procedures were comparable in terms of 7 years: Freedom from reoperation and recurrent MR = 2+/3+ (PeMA - 96.3%; PrMA - 96.4%; p = 0.914); freedom from complications (PeMA - 86.5%; PrMA - 89.2%; p = 0.174); survival (PeMA - 96.5%; PrMA - 97.8%; p = 0.238). Overall 7-year survival was 97.1%. Old-age and concomitant CAD were significant predictors of reoperation and recurrent MR = 2+/3+ (p = 0.027; HR = 1.131 and p = 0.030; HR = 2.002 respectively) and independent predictive factors for poor survival (p = 0.029; HR = 4.251 and p = 0.040; HR = 1.135 respectively) by multivariate analysis. High preoperative LVEF was independently related to a lower risk of reoperation and recurrence of MR = 2+/3+ (p = 0.006; HR = 0.786) and better survival (p = 0.013; HR = 0.718) by multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: With a reliable valvuloplasty, pericardial ring can be as durable as Physio ring and possibly surpass it with better methods of fixation. Cost-wise, pericardial ring is a better choice as it's free whilst Physio ring costs about $600. Prosthetic rings are not always associated with endocarditis, thromboembolism, valve calcification or hemolytic anemia.

Keywords: Autopericardium, Mitral valve failure, Mitral valve repair, Prosthetic ring

Received: December 13, 2019; Revised: December 13, 2019; Accepted: January 9, 2020; Published: February 28, 2020  Show citation