Cor Vasa 2025, 67(3):336-343 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2025.026

(Changes in Body Composition During Outpatient and Hybrid Cardiovascular Rehabilitation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease)

Marko Zváča, Ladislav Baťalíka, b, c, d
a Katedra fyzioterapie a rehabilitace, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno, Česká republika
b Rehabilitační klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Brno, Česká republika
c Rehabilitační klinika, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno, Česká republika
d Ústav veřejného zdraví, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno, Česká republika

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of traditional outpatient and hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs in improving body composition and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: A total of 136 out of 169 CAD patients completed a 12-week CR program (outpatient: n = 91, hybrid: n = 45). Body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis, while cardiovascular parameters were measured before and after the program.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in body composition, cardiovascular parameters, and aerobic capacity (+18 W vs +19 W; p <0.05). The outpatient group exhibited a higher increase in muscle mass (+0.65%, p <0.05) and visceral fat reduction, while the hybrid group showed a greater decrease in systolic blood pressure. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Both CR models are effective in improving body composition and cardiovascular risk factors. The hybrid model offers comparable safety and flexibility, making it an attractive alternative for a broader patient population.

Keywords: Body composition, Cardiac rehabilitation, Cardiovascular risk factors, Coronary artery disease, Hybrid rehabilitation

Received: January 2, 2025; Revised: February 10, 2025; Accepted: February 10, 2025; Prepublished online: June 2, 2012; Published: June 20, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zváč M, Baťalík L. (Changes in Body Composition During Outpatient and Hybrid Cardiovascular Rehabilitation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease). Cor Vasa. 2025;67(3):336-343. doi: 10.33678/cor.2025.026.
Download citation

References

  1. Di Cesare M, Perel P, Taylor S, et al. The Heart of the World. Glob Heart 2024;19:11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Flora GD, Nayak MK. A Brief Review of Cardiovascular Diseases, Associated Risk Factors and Current Treatment Regimes. Curr Pharm Des 2019;25:4063-4084. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Libby P, Theroux P. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2005;111:3481-3488. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2982-3021. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Committee for Science Guidelines; EACPR; Corrà U, Piepoli MF, Carré F, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: physical activity counselling and exercise training: key components of the position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1967-1974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Chaloupka V, Siegelová J, Špinarová L, et al. Rehabilitace u nemocných s kardiovaskulárním onemocněním. Cor Vasa 2006;48:7-8.
  7. Winnige P, Vysoky R, Dosbaba F, Batalik L. Cardiac rehabilitation and its essential role in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. World J Clin Cases 2021;9:1761-1784. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Candelaria D, Randall S, Ladak L, Gallagher R. Health-related quality of life and exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res 2020;29:579-592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Franklin BA, Eijsvogels TMH, Pandey A, et al. Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular health: A clinical practice statement of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology Part II: Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, minimum and goal intensities for exercise training, prescriptive methods, and special patient populations. Am J Prev Cardiol 2022;12:100425. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Taylor RS, Dalal HM, McDonagh STJ. The role of cardiac rehabilitation in improving cardiovascular outcomes. Nat Rev Cardiol 2022;19:180-194. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Ciuca-Pană M-A, Boulmpou A, Ileri C, et al. Chronic Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease: Pharmacological Treatment and Cardiac Rehabilitation. Medicina 2025;61:211. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Dibben GO, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta- -analysis. Eur Heart J 2023;44:452-469. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Batalik L, Filakova K, Sladeckova M, et al. The cost- -effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation intervention: a systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2023;59:248-258. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Grace SL, Kotseva K, Whooley MA. Cardiac Rehabilitation: Under-Utilized Globally. Curr Cardiol Rep 2021;23:118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Winnige P, Filakova K, Hnatiak J, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale in the Czech Republic (CRBS-CZE): Determination of Key Barriers in East- -Central Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:13113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. McDonagh ST, Dalal H, Moore S, et al. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023;10:CD007130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Stefanakis M, Batalik L, Antoniou V, Pepera G. Safety of home--based cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review. Heart Lung 2022;55:117-126. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Keteyian SJ, Ades PA, Beatty AL, et al. A Review of the Design and Implementation of a Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: AN EXPANDING OPPORTUNITY FOR OPTIMIZING CARDIOVASCULAR CARE. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2022;42:1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Brown TM, Pack QR, Aberegg E, et al. Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: 2024 Update: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2024;150:e328-e347. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ogawa H, Fujitani K, Tsujinaka T, et al. InBody 720 as a new method of evaluating visceral obesity. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:42-44.
  21. Kim EY, Kim SR, Won DD, et al. Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Compared With Computed Tomography for Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Primary Colorectal Malignancy: A Predictor of Short-Term Outcome After Surgery. Nutr Clin Pract 2020;35:664-674. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Guazzi M, Adams V, Conraads V. EACPR/AHA Scientific Statement. Clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation 2012;126:2261-2274. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Batalik L, Pepera G, Su JJ. Cardiac telerehabilitation improves lipid profile in the long term: Insights and implications. Int J Cardiol 2022;367:117-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Mirman AM, Nardoni NR, Chen AY, Horwich TB. Body Composition Changes During Traditional Versus Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation in Coronary Artery Disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2020;40:388-393. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Racodon M, Vanhove P, Bolpaire R, et al. Is hybrid cardiac rehabilitation superior to traditional cardiac rehabilitation? Acta Cardiol 2023;78:773-777. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Heindl B, Ramirez L, Joseph L, et al. Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation - The state of the science and the way forward. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2022;70:175-182. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Lavie CJ, Arena R, Swift DL, et al. Exercise and the cardiovascular system: clinical science and cardiovascular outcomes. Circ Res 2015;117:207-219. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Farinatti P, Monteiro WD, Oliveira RB. Long Term Home-Based Exercise is Effective to Reduce Blood Pressure in Low Income Brazilian Hypertensive Patients: A Controlled Trial. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2016;23:395-404. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Baťalík L. (Cardiovascular telerehabilitation: remotely monitored physical exercise). Cor Vasa 2021;63:79-85. [In Czech] Go to original source...
  30. Scherrenberg M, Wilhelm M, Hansen D, et al. The future is now: a call for action for cardiac telerehabilitation in the COVID-19 pandemic from the secondary prevention and rehabilitation section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021;28:524-540. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Keteyian SJ, Grimshaw C, Brawner CA, et al. A Comparison of Exercise Intensity in Hybrid Versus Standard Phase Two Cardiac Rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2021;41:19-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Keteyian SJ, Grimshaw C, Ehrman JK, et al. The iATTEND Trial: A Trial Comparing Hybrid Versus Standard Cardiac Rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol 2024;221:94-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Seron P, Oliveros MJ, Marzuca-Nassr GN, et al. Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in a Low-Resource Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2350301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Blioumpa C, Karanasiou E, Antoniou V, et al. Efficacy of supervised home-based, real time, videoconferencing telerehabilitation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a single--blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2023;59:628-639. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Su JJ, Yu DSF, Paguio JT. Effect of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2020;76:754-772. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Antoniou V, Davos CH, Kapreli E, et al. Effectiveness of Home--Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022;11:3772. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Su JJ, Yu DS. Effects of a nurse-led eHealth cardiac rehabilitation programme on health outcomes of patients with coronary heart disease: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2021;122:104040. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Su JJ, Wong AKC, He XF, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of cardiac telerehabilitation for older adults with coronary heart disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2024;42:101365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Su JJ, Wong AKC, Zhang LP, et al. Technology-assisted cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease patients with central obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2024;60:95-103. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Yang Z, Jia X, Li J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Hybrid Comprehensive Telerehabilitation (HCTR) for Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Occup Ther Int 2023;2023:5147805. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Stefanakis M, Batalik L, Papathanasiou J, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs in the era of COVID-19: a critical review. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2021;22:1143-1155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Batalik L, Konecny V, Dosbaba F, et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation Based on the Walking Test and Telerehabilitation Improved Cardiorespiratory Fitness in People Diagnosed with Coronary Heart Disease during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:2241. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Rawstorn JC, Gant N, Direito A, et al. Telehealth exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2016;102:1183-1192. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Brouwers RWM, van Exel HJ, van Hal JMC, et al. Cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Neth Heart J 2020;28:443-451. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Antoniou V, Kapreli E, Davos CH, et al. Safety and long- -term outcomes of remote cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review. Digit Health 2024;10:20552076241237661. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Pepera G, Antoniou V, Su JJ, et al. Comprehensive and personalized approach is a critical area for developing remote cardiac rehabilitation programs. World J Clin Cases 2024;12:2009-2015. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Su JJ. Exploring the Relationship Between Usage and Outcomes of an eHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation Intervention: Subanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Comput Inform Nurs 2023;41:578-585. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Etiwy M, Akras Z, Gillinov L, et al. Erratum to accuracy of wearable heart rate monitors in cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020;10:644-645. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Arena R, Williams M, Forman DE, et al. Increasing referral and participation rates to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the valuable role of healthcare professionals in the inpatient and home health settings: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012;125:1321-1329. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Grace SL, Ghanbari M, Cruz MMMAD, et al. Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Revised (CRBS-R) for hybrid delivery. BMJ Open 2024;14(10):e090261. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Ghisi GLM, da Cruz MMA, Vanderlei LCM, et al. Psychometric validation of the short version of the Information Needs in Cardiac Rehabilitation scale through a first global assessment. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2024;31:1927-1936. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  52. Ferrel-Yui D, Candelaria D, Pettersen TR, et al. Uptake and implementation of cardiac telerehabilitation: A systematic review of provider and system barriers and enablers. Int J Med Inform 2024;184:105346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  53. Bomtempo APD, Main E, Ghisi GLM. Remote Exercise Engagement Among Individuals With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2025;45:8-19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Su JJ, Paguio JT, Wang W, Batalik L. Designing a Nurse- -Led eHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Insights From Participant Experiences and Qualitative Feedback. Public Health Nurs 2025;42:144-153. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Su JJ, Paguio J, Baratedi WM, et al. Experience of coronary heart disease patients with a nurse-led eHealth cardiac rehabilitation: Qualitative process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. Heart Lung 2023;57:214-221. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  56. Echefu G, Batalik L, Lukan A, et al. The Digital Revolution in Medicine: Applications in Cardio-Oncology. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2025;27:2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  57. Su JJ, Bayuo J, Abu-Odah H, et al. Perception of eHealth Programs for Cardiovascular Health: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024;39:E140-E149. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.