Cor Vasa 2025, 67(3):323-330 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2025.008

Enhancing TAVI Patient Evaluation: A User-Friendly Tool for CT-Derived Body Composition Assessment

Marek Kantora, Jakub Balušíka, Piotr Brannya, b, Lubomír Blahaa, Jan Hečkoa, c, Matej Pekařa, d
a Complex Cardiovascular Center, Hospital AGEL Třinec-Podlesí, Třinec, the Czech Republic
b Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, the Czech Republic
c Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, the Czech Republic
d Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, the Czech Republic

Background: CT-derived body composition analysis has emerged as a powerful prognostic tool for TAVI patient outcomes. However, widespread clinical implementation remains limited by complex software requirements and technical expertise barriers. This study aims to develop and validate an accessible web-based interface that streamlines the implementation of existing AutoMATiCA's validated CT-based body composition assessment in the pre-TAVI evaluation workflow.

Methods: We developed a web-based interface integrating the validated AutoMATiCA's AI-driven segmentation software for automated body composition assessment. The system analyses pre-procedural CT scans to quantify Skeletal Muscle Index, Visceral Adipose Tissue, and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue. The interface accepts DICOM files and patient data, generating comprehensive reports including segmented images and measurements.

Results: System evaluation demonstrated an average analysis time of 21 seconds from upload to results display. User experience assessment with five clinicians showed unanimous positive feedback regarding acces- sibility and utility. Technical validation confirmed accurate tissue segmentation and quantification capabilities. Analysis of illustrative cases demonstrated significant discrepancies between BMI-based assessment and CT-derived body composition analysis, revealing conditions such as sarcopenic obesity and preserved muscle mass that would be missed by BMI evaluation alone.

Conclusion: This technical solution provides an accessible, integrated approach to body composition assessment in TAVI patients. Building upon the validated AutoMATiCA software, the system successfully bridges the gap between complex analysis capabilities and clinical practicality through an intuitive user interface. This solution should enable more precise risk stratification and a more individualized approach to patients indicated for TAVI in the future.

Keywords: Body composition, Obesity, Overall survival, Sarcopenia, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI),

Received: December 16, 2024; Revised: January 12, 2025; Accepted: January 14, 2025; Prepublished online: June 2, 2012; Published: June 20, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kantor M, Balušík J, Branny P, Blaha L, Hečko J, Pekař M. Enhancing TAVI Patient Evaluation: A User-Friendly Tool for CT-Derived Body Composition Assessment. Cor Vasa. 2025;67(3):323-330. doi: 10.33678/cor.2025.008.
Download citation

References

  1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic- -valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1597-1607. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Pekar M, Jiravsky O, Novak J, et al. Sarcopenia and adipose tissue evaluation by artificial intelligence predicts the overall survival after TAVI. Sci Rep 2024;14:8842. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Brown AD, Li B, Gabriel S, et al. Association Between Sarcopenia and Adverse Events Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. CJC Open 2021;4:173-179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Paris MT, Tandon P, Heyland DK, et al. Automated body composition analysis of clinically acquired computed tomography scans using neural networks. Clin Nutr 2020;39:3049-3055. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Nashef SAM, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41:734-745. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005;173:489-95. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Chodór P, Wilczek K, Zielińska T, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular function following transcatheter aortic valve implantation based on six-minute walk test. Cardiol J 2017;24:167-175. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Chin K, Jones R, Lester E, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment, and related interventions, to improve outcomes for older patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a systematic review. Eur Geriatr Med 2024;15:1615-1630. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Charlson ME, Carrozzino D, Guidi J, Patierno C. Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties. Psychother Psychosom 2022;91:8-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.