Cor Vasa 2024, 66(6):592-597 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2024.054

(Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy)

Roland Oravský, Andrej Nagy
I. interní kardioangiologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Brno, Česká republika

Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) does not have an internationally accepted definition. In general, the term refers to the heart failure with a left ventricular EF below 50% and its reduction ≥ 10% after implantation of a pacemaker without known cause. The pacing burden that increases the risk of PICM is > 20%. On the other hand, it cannot be said that a lower pacing burden is safe or that a higher pacing burden is clearly harmful. It is necessary to identify patients with a higher risk of developing PICM before the implantation of a pacemaker and offer other (for now) alternative methods of pacing. In the case of an already developed PICM, an upgrade to a CRT or a CSP should be considered. If indicated it is recommended to perform the upgrade without unnecessary delay after the recognition of the PICM.

Keywords: Cardiac pacing, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Conduction system pacing, Pacing induced cardiomyopathy

Received: June 27, 2024; Revised: June 27, 2024; Accepted: July 18, 2024; Prepublished online: June 2, 2012; Published: December 20, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Oravský R, Nagy A. (Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy). Cor Vasa. 2024;66(6):592-597. doi: 10.33678/cor.2024.054.
Download citation

References

  1. Lamas GA, Lee K, Sweeney M, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854-1862. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator. The dual chamber and VVI implantable defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA 2002;288:3115-3123. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Laksono S, Angkasa IS, Hosanna C. Pacing induced cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis and management. ASEAN Heart Journal 2023;32:3. Go to original source...
  4. Merchant FM, Mittal S. Pacing induced cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020;31:286-292. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kaye G, Ng JY, Ahmed S, et al. The prevalence of pacing- -induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) in patients with long term right ventricular pacing - Is it matter of definition? Heart Lung Circ 2019;28:1027-1033. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Lieberman R, Padeletti L, Schreuder J, et al. Ventricular pacing lead location alters systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with and without reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1634-1641. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Matsuoka K, Nishino M, Kato H, et al. Right ventricular apical pacing impairs left ventricular twist as well as synchrony: acute effects of right ventricular apical pacing. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:914-919. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Naqvi TZ, Chao CJ. Adverse effects of right ventricular pacing on cardiac function: prevalence, prevention and treatment with physiologic pacing. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2023;33:109-122. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Burri H, Starck C, Auricchio A, et al. EHRA expert consensus statement and practical guide on optimal implantationtechnique for conventional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). Europace 2021;23:983-1008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Albakri A, Bimmel D. Right ventricular septal or apical? Which is optimal positioning in pacemaker implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Integr Mol Med 2020;8:1-7. Go to original source...
  11. Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB, et al. Beneficial effects of right ventricular non-apical vs. apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Europace 2012;14:81-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Weizong W, Zhongsu W, Yujiao Z, et al. Effects of right ventricular nonapical pacing on cardiac function: a meta--analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2013;36:1032-1051. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Israel CW, Tribunyan S, Ho SY, et al. Anatomy for right ventricular lead implantation. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2022;33:319-326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Cano O, Andres A, Alonso P, et al. Incidence and predictors of clinically relevant cardiac perforation associated with systematic implantation of active-fixation pacing and defibrillation leads: a single centre experience with over 3800 implanted leads. Europace 2017;19:96-102. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Burri H, Sunthorn H, Dorsaz PA, et al. Thresholds and complications with right ventricular septal pacing compared to apical pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:75-78. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Pang BJ, Barold SS, Mond HG. Injury to the coronary arteries and related structures by implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace 2015;17:524-529. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Sweeney MO, Bank AJ, Nsah E, et al. Search AV Extension and Managed Ventricular Pacing for Promoting Atrioventricular Conduction Trial. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1000-1008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Jankelson L, Bordachar P, Strik M, et al. Reducing right ventricular pacing burden: algorithms, benefits, and risks. Europace 2019;21:539-547. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Stockburger M, Boveda S, Moreno J, et al. Long-term clinical effects of ventricular pacing reduction with a changeover mode to minimize ventricular pacing in a general pacemaker population. Eur Heart J 2015;36:151-157. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Shurrab M, Healey JS, Haj-Yahia S, et al. Reduction in unnecessary ventricular pacing fails to affect hard clinical outcomes in patients with preserved left ventricular function: a meta-analysis. Europace 2017;19:282-288. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Tse HF, Yu C, Wong KK, et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1451-1458. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA, Zhang X, et al. Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14:1180-1186. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Mera F, DeLurgio DB, Patterson, et al. A comparison of ventricular function during high right ventricular septal and apical pacing after His-bundle ablation for refractory atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22:1234-1239. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Bourke JP, Hawkins T, Keavey P, et al. Evolution of ventricular function during permanent pacing from either right ventricular apex or outflow tract following AV-junctional ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace 2002;4:219-228. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J, et al. Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: the Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1927-1937. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, et al. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1585-1593. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Filho MM, Siqueira SF de, Costa R, et al. Conventional versus biventricular pacing in heart failure and bradyarrhythmia: the COMBAT study. J Card Fail 2010;16:293-300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Linde CM, Normand C, Bogale N, et al. Upgrades from a previous device compared to de nove cardiac resynchronization therapy in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey II. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:1457-1468. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Foley PW, Muhyaldeen SA, Chalil S, et al. Long-term effects of upgrading from right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure. Europace 2009;11:495-501. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Merkely B, Hatala R, Wranicz JK, et al. Upgrade of right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2023;44:4259-4269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 2022;43:3997-4126. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Yu CM, Chan JY, Zhang Q, et al. Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2123-2134. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Yu CM, Fang F, Luo XX, et al. Long-term follow-up results of the pacing to avoid cardiac enlargement (PACE) trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:1016-1025. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Stockburger M, Gómez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G, et al. Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: results from a multicentre international randomized trial (PREVENT-HF). Eur J Heart Fail 2011;13:633-641. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Stockburger M, de Teresa E, Lamas G, et al. Exercise capacity and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels with biventricular vs. right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block: results from the PREVENT-HF German Substudy. Europace 2014;16:63-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Deshmukh PM, Romanyshyn M. Direct His-bundle pacing: present and future. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:862-870. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Chen Z, Xu Y, Jiang L, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing versus right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block: An observational cohort study. Cardiovasc Ther 2023;2023:6659048. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Leventopoulos G, Patrinos P, Papageorgiou A, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing versus conventional pacing in patients with advanced atrioventricular conduction abnormalities: a prospective cohort study. Hellenic J Cardiol 2024;5:S1109-9666(24)00060-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Kaza N, Htun V, Miyazawa A, et al. Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventrivular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 2023;25:1077-1086. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau CP, et al. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm 2023;20:e17-e91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.