Cor Vasa 2024, 66(1):37-43 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2023.096

Artificial intelligence in resting ECG: Higher accuracy in the interpretation of rhythm abnormalities

Štěpán Havráneka, Barbora Stekláa, Michaela Veseláa, Josef Holuba, Michaela Zemkováa, Lucie Miksováa, Karolína Kvasničkováa, Nikol Kubínováa, Jean-Claude Lubandaa, Milan Dusíka, Josef Mareka, Vladyslava Čeledováb, Lenka Plačkováb
a 2nd Department of Internal Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, the Czech Republic
b BTL Industries Ltd., Stevenage, the United Kingdom

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a developed novel AI-based ECG rhythm model (AI-ECGRM) in binary classification between sinus rhythm and arrhythmias.

Methods: The interpretations generated by the AI-ECGRM were compared to the diagnostic conclusions made by cardiologists. The confusion matrix was used to verify the AI-ECGRM's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Results: The testing dataset included 1,491 randomly selected ECGs (mean age 65±21 years; 54% female). Out of the testing dataset, the highly advanced cardiologists diagnosed 1,271 ECGs as sinus rhythm and 220 as arrhythmia. The AI-ECGRM labelled 1,169 as sinus rhythm and 322 as arrhythmia out of the same ECGs. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 94% and 91%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 64%. The negative predictive value was 99%, indicating a very low probability of missing any potential pathology.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated the efficacy of the developed AI-ECGRM in accurately discriminating between ECGs exhibiting normal sinus rhythm and those indicating cardiac arrhythmias. Moreover, the AI-ECGRM exhibited an exceptional negative predictive value, approaching 100%.

Keywords: Arrhythmia, Artificial intelligence, Cardiovascular diseases, ECG interpretation, Resting ECG, Sinus rhythm

Received: December 10, 2023; Revised: December 10, 2023; Accepted: December 15, 2023; Prepublished online: June 2, 2012; Published: March 5, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Havránek Š, Steklá B, Veselá M, Holub J, Zemková M, Miksová L, et al.. Artificial intelligence in resting ECG: Higher accuracy in the interpretation of rhythm abnormalities. Cor Vasa. 2024;66(1):37-43. doi: 10.33678/cor.2023.096.
Download citation

References

  1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2982-3021. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. Forecasting the Future of Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ J 2011;123:933-944. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Moran A, Gu D, Zhao D, et al. Future Cardiovascular Disease in China: Markov Model and Risk Factor Scenario Projections From the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model-China. Circ J 2010;3:243-252. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Odutayo A, Wong ChX, Hsiao AJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation and risks of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016;354:i4482. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kavousi M. Differences in Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation Between Women and Men. Front Cardiovasc 2020;7:3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, et al. Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation: A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circ J 2013;129:837-847. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Harmon KG, Zigman M, Drezner JA. The effectiveness of screening history, physical exam, and ECG to detect potentially lethal cardiac disorders in athletes: A systematic review/meta- -analysis. J Electrocardiol 2015;48:329-338. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Harskamp RE. Electrocardiographic screening in primary care for cardiovascular disease risk and atrial fibrillation. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2019;20:1-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Goya JJ, Schlaepfer J, Stauffer JC. Competency in interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram among Swiss doctors. Swiss Med Wkly 2013;143:w13806. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Cook DA, Oh SY, Pusic MV. Accuracy of Physicians' Electrocardiogram Interpretations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:1-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Bhatia RS, Bouck Z, Ivers NM, et al. Electrocardiograms in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing an Annual Health Examination. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:1326-1333. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Valk MJ, Mosterd A, Broekhuizen BD, et al. Overdiagnosis of heart failure in primary care: a cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract 2016;66:e587-592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Schläpfer J, Wellens HJ. Computer-Interpreted Electrocardiograms: Benefits and Limitations: Review Topic Of The Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1183-1192. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Šećkanović A, Šehovac M, Spahić L, et al. Review of Artificial Intelligence Application in Cardiology. In: 9th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), Budva, Montenegro, 2020. p.1-5. doi: 10.1109/MECO49872.2020.9134333 Go to original source...
  15. Busnatu Ș, Niculescu AG, Bolocan A, et al. Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence - An Updated Overview. J Clin Med 2022;11:2265. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Hughes JW, Olgin JE, Avram R, et al. Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network and Explainability Technique for 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Interpretation. JAMA Cardiol 2021;6:1285-1295. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Kaggle. Shaoxing and Ningbo Hospital ECG Database. Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/bjoernjostein/shaoxing-and-ningbo-first-hospital-database. Accessed: 17 Mar 2023.
  18. Trevethan R, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice. Front Public Health 2017;5:307. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Warriner D, Malhotra A, Apps A. An epidemic of overdiagnosis and overtreatment: getting to the heart of the problem. J R Soc Med 2017;110:390-391. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Novotny T, Bond RR, Andrsova I, et al. Data analysis of diagnostic accuracies in 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation by junior medical fellows. J Electrocardiol 2015;48:988-994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Kwon JM, Kim KH, Eisen HJ, et al. Artificial intelligence assessment for early detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on electrocardiographic features. Eur Heart J - Digital Health 2020;2:106-116. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Jo YY, Kwon JM, Jeon KH, et al. Artificial intelligence to diagnose paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia using electrocardiography during normal sinus rhythm. Eur Heart J - Digital Health 2021;2:290-298. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet 2019;394:861-867. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Baek YS, Lee SC, Choi W, Kim DH. A new deep learning algorithm of 12-lead electrocardiogram for identifying atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm. Sci Rep 2021;11:12818. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.