Cor Vasa 2023, 65(1):23-29 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2022.093

Coronary artery bypass grafting after iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: A single center eight years' experience

Mehmet Ali Yeşiltaş, Ali Aycan Kavala, Saygin Turkyilmaz, Yusuf Kuserli, Hasan Toz, Onur Emre Satilmis
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Background: Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection during diagnostic or therapeutic catheterization is a rare and mortal complication that may result in a newly developed myocardial infarction. In this study, we aimed to share the results of CABG treatment of patients with iatrogenic coronary artery dissection after coronary angiography (CAG) in our clinic.

Methods: All patients who underwent CAG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital between January 2014 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively and patients who underwent CABG after iatrogenic coronary artery dissection were included in the study. The dissection classification was achived according to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) classification.

Results: During the eight years, CAG was applied to 20,398 patients and PCI to 9583 patients. Needed to treat CABG in iatrogenic coronary artery dissection developed in 17 of the patients (0.06%). LMCA was dissected in 6 (35.3%) patients and LAD in 6 (35.3%), CX in 2 (11.8%) and RCA dissection in 3 (17.6%). 3 pa- tients (17.6%) had an intubation time longer than 48 hours. One of them has recently had a COVID infection. Another was suffering from pulmonary edema. The other patient died on the 4th postoperative day due to low cardiac output. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was 2 (min: 1 - max: 13) days. The hospital stay was 6 (min: 4 - max: 20) days.

Conclusion: The development of a critical clinical condition prior to surgery is strongly associated with a higher probability of early and late postoperative death. For this reason, it is clear that the treatments applied at every stage of the pre-, per-, and postoperative period are the most important determinants of the results.

Keywords: Cardiac surgery, Complications, Coronary angiography, Coronary artery bypass grafting, Coronary artery dissection, Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection

Received: July 4, 2022; Revised: August 9, 2022; Accepted: August 10, 2022; Published: March 1, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Yeşiltaş MA, Aycan Kavala A, Turkyilmaz S, Kuserli Y, Toz H, Satilmis OE. Coronary artery bypass grafting after iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: A single center eight years' experience. Cor Vasa. 2023;65(1):23-29. doi: 10.33678/cor.2022.093.
Download citation

References

  1. Gilhofer TS, Saw J. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a review of complications and management strategies. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2019;17:275-291. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Eshtehardi P, Adorjan P, Togni M, et al. Iatrogenic left main coronary artery dissection: incidence, classification, management, and long-term follow-up. Am Heart J 2010;159:1147-1153. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Ajluni SC, Glazier S, Blankenship L, et al. Perforations after percutaneous coronary interventions: clinical, angiographic, and therapeutic observations. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;32:206-212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Al-Lamee R, Ielasi A, Latib A, et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:87-95. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Reinecke H, Fetsch T, Roeder N, et al. Emergency coronary bypass grafting after failed coronary angioplasty: what has changed in a decade? Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1997-2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Devlin G, Lazzam L, Schwartz L. Mortality related to diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The importance of left main coronary disease and catheter induced trauma. Int J Card Imaging 1997;13:379-384, discussion 385-386. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cheng CI, Wu CJ, Hsieh YK, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for iatrogenic left main coronary artery dissection. Int J Cardiol 2008;126:177-182. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Ravaid A, Buch AN, Satler LF, et al. Management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:911-914. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Carey JA, Davies S, Balcon R, Layton C, et al. Emergency surgical revascularization for coronary angioplasty complications. Br Heart J 1994;72:428-435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Shimony A, Zahger D, Van Straten M, et al. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1674-1677. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Prakash R, Starovoytov A, Heydari M, et al. Catheter-induced iatrogenic coronary artery dissection in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:1851-1853. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Ramasamy A, Bajaj R, Jones DA, et al. Iatrogenic catheter-induced ostial coronary artery dissections: Prevalence, management, and mortality from a cohort of 55,968 patients over 10 years. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021;98:649-655. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Amano H, Kubo S, Osakada K, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Angiographic Results of Bailout Stenting for Guide Catheter-Induced Iatrogenic Coronary Artery Dissection - Impact of Stent Type. Circ J 2020;84:1746-1753. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Rogers JH, Lasala JM. Coronary artery dissection and perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16:493-499. Go to PubMed...
  15. Connors JP, Thanavaro S, Shaw RC, et al. Urgent myocardial revascularization for dissection of the left main coronary artery: a complication of coronary angiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;84:349-352. Go to original source...
  16. Weiss ES, Chang DD, Joyce DL, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:503-511. Go to original source...
  17. Kaya K, Cavolli R, Telli A, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a clinical analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;5:31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Kaya E, Işik Ö, Fotbolcu H, Yakut, C. Our experience with complete revascularization on beating heart in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Turk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;24(4). Go to original source...
  19. Laffey JG, Boylan JF, Cheng DC. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:215-252. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Paparella D, Yau TM, Young E. Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation; pathophysiology and treatment. An update. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:232-244. Go to original source...
  21. Larmann J, Theilmeier G. Inlammatory response to cardiac surgery: cardiopulmonary bypass versus noncardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2004;18;425-438. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Kloner RA. Stunned and hibernating myocardium: where are we nearly 4 decades later? J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e015502. Go to original source...
  23. Przyklenk K, Kloner RA. Acute effects of hydralazine and enalapril on contractile function of postischemic "stunned" myocardium. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:934-936. Go to original source...
  24. Chadha DS, Bhat KG. Acute coronary syndrome with haemodynamic instability. In: Chandra KS, Swamy AJ, eds. Acute Coronary Syndromes. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2020:145-152. Go to original source...
  25. Farmakis D, Agostoni P, Baholli L, et al. A pragmatic approach to the use of inotropes for the management of acute and advanced heart failure: An expert panel consensus. Int J Cardiol 2019;297:83-90. Go to original source...
  26. Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent JL, et al. Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the sepsis occurrence in acutely Ill patients (SOAP) study. Crit Care Med 2006;34:589-597. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Nativ Nicolau J, Selzman CH, Fang JC, Stehlik J. Pharmacologic therapies for acute cardiogenic shock. Curr Opin Cardiol 2014;29:250-257. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Lim JY, Park SJ, Kim HJ, et al. Comparison of dopamine versus norepinephrine in circulatory shock after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Card Surg 2021;36:3711-3718. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. den Uil CA, Van Mieghem NM, Bastos MB, et al. Primary intra-aortic balloon support versus inotropes for decompensated heart failure and low output: a randomised trial. EuroIntervention 2019;15:586-593. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.