Cor Vasa 2022, 64(1):20-24 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2021.103

Review of non-insulin antidiabetic pharmacotherapy in patients with heart failure diabetes mellitus in the Czech Republic in 2018

Marek Víchaa, Tomáš Skálaa, Klára Benešováb, c, Ladislav Dušekb, c, Jakub Flašíka, Luděk Pavlůa, Štěpán Hudeca, Miloš Táborskýa
a I. interní klinika - kardiologická, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci a Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc, Olomouc
b Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky ČR, Praha
c Institut biostatistiky a analýz Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, Brno

Aim: Retrospective observational analysis of non-insulin antidiabetic pharmacotherapy reported to the National Register of Paid Health Services (NRHHS) in the Czech Republic (CR) in patients with heart failure (HF) and concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) in 2018.

Methods: Individuals with a comorbid diagnosis of heart failure (I50.x) and diabetes mellitus (E10-E14) based on ICD-10 classification and reported ATC drug code.

Results: In 2018, 117,265 people were diagnosed with both HF and DM. At least one antidiabetic drug (insulin or non-insulin) was reported in 88 749 patients (75.7% of the prevalence of HF and DM). Metformin was the dominant non-insulin drug therapy (45.6% overall). In fixed combination with metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors) predominated in 5.4%, slightly less sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 inhibitors) in 1.5%. Sulphonylurea derivatives, namely gliclazide (10.3%) and glimepiride (9.0%), had the second highest representation in the analysis, followed by DPP-4 inhibitors, mainly linagliptin (6.8%). Among the SGLT-2 inhibitors, empaglifl ozin (1.8%) and dapaglifl ozin (0.8%) predominated. Subcutaneously administered glucagon-like polypeptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 agonists) alone were used by 0.7% of the prevalent HF and DM subjects, in fi xed combination with insulin (degludec-liraglutide) by 1.1% and glargine-lixisenatide by 0.1%.

Conclusion: The most commonly used oral antidiabetic drug in people with HF and DM in 2018 was metformin, similarly as in other foreign registries. Sulfonylurea derivatives continue to hold an important position, despite the absence of benefi ts on mortality, or morbidity in heart failure patients. With the advent of large randomized trials and registration of new molecules, the importance of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists is increasing in persons at high cardiovascular risk.

Keywords: Czech Republic, Diabetes mellitus, Heart failure, National Register of Paid Health Services, Pharmacotherapy

Received: July 21, 2021; Revised: July 21, 2021; Accepted: August 21, 2021; Published: February 22, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vícha M, Skála T, Benešová K, Dušek L, Flašík J, Pavlů L, et al.. Review of non-insulin antidiabetic pharmacotherapy in patients with heart failure diabetes mellitus in the Czech Republic in 2018. Cor Vasa. 2022;64(1):20-24. doi: 10.33678/cor.2021.103.
Download citation

References

  1. Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F. Global epidemiology and future trends of heart failure. AME Med J 2020;5:15. Go to original source...
  2. IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th edition. IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th edition 2019. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, Ninth Edition. 2019.
  3. Dunlay SM, Givertz MM, Aguilar D, et al. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and the Heart Failure Society of America: This statement does not represent an update of the 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guideline update. Circulation 2019;140:e294-e324. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Nichols GA, Gullion CM, Koro CE, et al. The incidence of congestive heart failure in type 2 diabetes: an update. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1879-1884. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. de Leiva-Hidalgo A, de Leiva-Pérez A. Experiences of First Insulin-Treated Patients (1922-1923). Am J Ther 2020;27:e13-e23. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 2020;41:255-323. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Táborsky M, Linhart A, Rosolová H, et al. Doporučené postupy ESC pro diabetes, prediabetes a kardiovaskulární onemocnění, vypracované ve spolupráci s EASD, 2019. Souhrn dokumentupřipravený Českou kardiologickou společností. Cor Vasa 2020;62:105-138. Go to original source...
  8. Arnold SV, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Lam CS, et al. Patterns of glucose-lowering medication use in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure. Insights from the Diabetes Collaborative Registry (DCR). Am Heart J 2018;203:25-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Roumie CL, Min JY, D'Agostino McGowan L, et al. Comparative Safety of Sulfonylurea and Metformin Monotherapy on the Risk of Heart Failure: A Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e005379. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Eurich DT, Weir DL, Majumdar SR, et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of metformin in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure: systematic review of observational studies involving 34,000 patients. Circ Heart Fail 2013;6:395-402. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Montvida O, Shaw J, Atherton JJ, et al. Long-term trends in antidiabetes drug usage in the U.S.: Real-world evidence in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2018;41:69-78. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Rosenstock J, Perkovic V, Johansen OE, et al. Effect of Linagliptin vs Placebo on Major Cardiovascular Events in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular and Renal Risk: The CARMELINA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019;321:69-79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW, et al. Effect of Sitagliptin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:232-242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, et al. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1327-1335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Udell JA, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate or severe renal impairment: Observations from the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial. Diabetes Care 2015;38:696-705. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Tang H, Shi W, Fu S, et al. Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2018;7:1070-1080. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Rubino D, Abrahamsson N, Davies M, et al. Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 4 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021;325:1414-1425. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Fitchett D, Zinman B, Wanner C, et al. Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: Results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Eur Heart J 2016;37:1535-1537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Mahaffey KW, Neal B, Perkovic V, et al. Canagliflozin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: Results from the CANVAS Program (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study). Circulation 2018;137:323-334. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019;380:347-357. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Špinar J, Špinarová L, Vítovec J. Dapagliflozin a srdeční selhání. Cor Vasa 2020;62:618-623. Go to original source...
  22. Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Steg PG, et al. Sotagliflozin in Patients with Diabetes and Recent Worsening Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2021;384:117-128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Maddox TM, Januzzi JL, Allen LA, et al. 2021 Update to the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:772-810. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Holman RR, Coleman RL, Chan JCN, et al. Effects of acarbose on cardiovascular and diabetes outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance (ACE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:877-886. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Kumar R, Kerins DM, Walther T. Cardiovascular safety of anti-diabetic drugs. Eur Hear J - Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2015;2:32-43. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.