Cor Vasa 2021, 63(3):333-338 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2020.107

Gender specific differences in functional capacity in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis

Marko Banovica, b, Voin Brkovicb, Martin Penickac, Vladan Vukcevica, b, Milika Asanina, b, Andrea Manojlovicd, Milica Bojanicb, Ivana Nedeljkovica, b, Srdjan Aleksandrica, b, Miodrag Jovanovice, Serge Nikolicf
a Cardiology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia
b Belgrade Medical School, Belgrade, Serbia
c Aalst Cardiovascular Center, Aalst, Belgium
d Clinical Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia
e Clinical Center Veliko Gradiste, Veliko Gradiste, Serbia
f CDI, Redwood City, California, USA

Female gender has been linked to increased risk of adverse events after surgical aortic valve replacement but with better outcome after TAVI. Less is known regarding functional capacity between the genders with severe AS. We investigated whether there is a gender difference in functional capacity in asymptomatic group of patients with severe AS.

Method: Asymptomatic patients with severe AS were prospectively enrolled and underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on supine ergobicycle, ramp protocol, 15 W/min. Patients with test positive for ischemia were excluded.

Results: There were 139 patients, 61 women. There were no baseline gender differences in age (66.11 vs 64.8, p = ns), echo parameters of AS severity (Vmax 4.53 vs 4.53 m/s, and Pmean 52.27 vs 53.42 mmHg, all p = ns) except AVA (0.75 ± 0.1 vs 0.63 ± 0.17), LVEF (68.7 vs 71.6%), E/e' (12.6 vs 14.3) and BNP (92.5 vs 103 pg/ml), all p = ns. Women had higher body mass index (29.5 vs 27.3, p = 0.018), lower VO2max (13.10 vs 17.6 ml/kg/m2, p = 0.001) and higher VE/VCO2 slope (33.69 vs 28.87, p = 0.004). Univariable/multivariable linear regression analyses were used to test the relation between clinical and echocardiographic characteristics with VO2max. The variables independently associated with the VO2max were female gender (beta = -0.365, p = 0.002), Vmax (beta= -0.341, p = 0.004), age (beta = -0.239, p = 0.035) and BMI (beta = -0.246, p = 0.028), Conclusion: Female gender is the strongest independent predictor of decreased functional capacity, even when adjusting for other variables, including BMI and echo markers of AS severity. Further studies are needed to determine whether this finding affects the outcome of the disease

Keywords: Aortic stenosis, Asymptomatic, Functional capacity, Gender

Received: September 30, 2020; Revised: September 30, 2020; Accepted: November 17, 2020; Published: July 20, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Banovic M, Brkovic V, Penicka M, Vukcevic V, Asanin M, Manojlovic A, et al.. Gender specific differences in functional capacity in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. Cor Vasa. 2021;63(3):333-338. doi: 10.33678/cor.2020.107.
Download citation

References

  1. Bing R, Everett RJ, Tuck C, et al. Rationale and design of the randomized, controlled Early Valve Replacement Guided by Biomarkers of Left Ventricular Decompensation in Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis (EVOLVED) trial. Am Heart J 2019;212:91-100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Banovic M, Iung B, Bartunek J, et al. The Aortic Valve replAcemenT versus conservative treatment in Asymptomatic seveRe aortic stenosis (AVATAR trial): A protocol update. Am Heart J 2018;195:153-154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Banovic M, Nikolic SD, Putnik S. A Randomized Trial in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Future Has Begun! J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1970-1971. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Chaker Z, Badhwar V, Alqahtani F, et al. Sex differences in the utilization and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e006370. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Chandrasekhar J, Dangas G, Yu J, et al. Sex-Based differences in outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve therapy: TVT registry from 2011 to 2014. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2733-2744. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Skelding KA, Yakubov SJ, Kleiman NS, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgery in women at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (from the CoreValve us high risk pivotal trial). Am J Cardiol 2016;118:560-566. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fortin S, Nkomo V, Brala D, et al. Role of Cardiopulmonary test performance in post-aortic valve replacement patients, relationship with echocardiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:1998. Go to original source...
  8. Banovic M, Iung B, Bartunek J, et al. Rationale and design of the Aortic Valve replAcemenT versus conservative treatment in Asymptomatic seveRe aortic stenosis (AVATAR trial): A randomized multicenter controlled event-driven trial. Am Heart J 2016;174:147-153. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al; American Society of Echocardiography; European Association of Echocardiography. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:1-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Wezman A; The committee on M Mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations regarding quantification in M mode echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978;58:1072. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Albouaini K, Egred M, Alahmar A. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and its application. Postgrad Med J 2007;83:675-682. Go to original source...
  12. Treibel T, Kozor R, Schofield R, et al. Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:860-871. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Fairbairn T, Steadman CD, Mather AN, et al. Assessment of valve hemodynamic, reverse ventricular remodelling and myocardial fibrosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Heart 2013;99:1185-1191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Gee MA, Viera AJ, Miller P, Tolleson-Rineheart S. Functional capacity in men and women following cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2014;34:255-262. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Jarrell L, Hains SM, Kisilevsky BS, Brown CA. Gender differences in functional capacity following myocardial infarction: an exploratory study. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs 2005;15:28-33.
  16. Shan Y, Pellikka P. Aortic stenosis in women. Heart 2020;106:970-976. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Simard L, Côté N, Dagenais F, et al. Sex-Related discordance between aortic valve calcification and hemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis: is valvular fibrosis the explanation? Circ Res 2017;120:681-691. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Dobson LE, Fairbairn TA, Musa TA, et al. Sex-Related differences in left ventricular remodeling in severe aortic stenosis and reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Am Heart J 2016;175:101-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Tastet L, Kwiecinski J, Pibarot P, et al. Sex-Related differences in the extent of myocardial fibrosis in patients with aortic valve stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:699-711. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Lauten A, Figulla HR, Mollmann H, et al. TAVI for low-flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved or reduced ejection fraction: a subgroup analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). EuroIntervention 2014;10:850-859. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 2007;115:2856-2864. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Meyer M, McEntee R, Nyotowidjojo I, et al. Relationship of Exercise Capacity and Left Ventricular Dimensions in Patients with a Normal Ejection Fraction. An Exploratory Study. PLoS One 2015;10(3):e0119432. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Mihos CG, Klassen SL, Yucel E. Sex-Specific Considerations in Women with Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes After Transcatheter A.
  24. Singh A, Chan DCS, Greenwood JP, et al. Symptom onset in aortic stenosis: relation to sex differences in left ventricular remodeling. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:96-105. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Banovic M, Iung B, Brkovic V, et al. Silent coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal exercise testing. Coron Artery Dis 2020;2:166-173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Banovic M, Athithan L, McCann GP. Aortic stenosis and diabetes mellitus: An ominous combination. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2019;16:310-323. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.