Cor Vasa 2020, 62(1):33-36 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2019.080

Aborted sternotomy in the modern era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Ivo Gasparovič, Panagiotis Artemiou, Michal Hulman
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty of Comenius University, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovakia

Introduction: Some patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis undergo sternotomy and have the operation aborted because of intraoperative discovery of unexpected severe calcification of the aorta. The aim of this study is to present our experience and analyze the causes, the management, and the outcomes of these patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective study. Between January 2010 and December 2017 10565 patients underwent cardiac surgery, 27 patients (0.3%) had aborted sternotomy, of whom seven patients with severe aortic stenosis. The reason was unexpected intraoperative discovery of severe calcified ascending aorta that precluded placing of an aortic cross-clamp. Following the aborted sternotomy, based on the heart team's decision, 2 patients were referred for conservative treatment, 5 patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve replace- ment. The mean and median follow-up times were 33 ± 20 and 39 (0-54) months respectively.

Results: Mean and median time between the aborted sternotomy and the next intervention were 2.6 ± 1.4 and 2 (1-5) months respectively with no mortality within this period. The total long-term mortality was 4/7 patients (57.14%). Both patients (100%) who were referred for conservative treatment, as well as two of the five patients (40%) that had undergone TAVR, died during follow-up.

Conclusions: Aborted sternotomy had higher hospital and long-term mortality. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, despite the relative high long-term mortality, had a better effect on the survival compared to the patients who were offered only conservative treatment. A preventive strategy in these high risk patients might be based on routine preoperative chest computer tomography imaging.

Keywords: Aborted sternotomy, Porcelain aorta, Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Received: October 14, 2019; Revised: October 14, 2019; Accepted: November 24, 2019; Published: February 28, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gasparovič I, Artemiou P, Hulman M. Aborted sternotomy in the modern era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cor Vasa. 2020;62(1):33-36. doi: 10.33678/cor.2019.080.
Download citation

References

  1. Coselli JS, Crawford ES. Aortic valve replacement in the patient with extensive calcification of the ascending aorta (the porcelain aorta). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;91:184-187. Go to original source...
  2. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2187-2198. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Van Mieghem NM, Van Der Boon RMA. Porcelain aorta and severe aortic stenosis: is transcatheter aortic valve implantation the new standard? Rev Esp Cardiol 2013;66:765-767. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Linke A, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation: therapy choice for patients with aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta? Ann Thorac Surg 2012;90:1457-1462. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Gillinov AM, Lytle BW, Hoang V, et al. The atherosclerotic aorta at aortic valve replacement: surgical strategies and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:957-963. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Salem M, Mohammad B, Huenges K, et al. Severe calcification of the ascending aorta detected incidentally in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019 Apr 4. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683998. [Epub ahead of print] Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Kaneko T, Neely RC, Shekar P, et al. The safety of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in aortic valve replacement with unclampable aorta in non-octagenerians. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2015;20:79-84 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Gatti G, Benussi B, Camerini A, Pappalardo A. Aortic valve replacement within an unexpected porcelain aorta: the suturless valve option. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014;18:396-398. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Castrodeza J, Amat-Santos IJ, Serra V, et al. Therapeutic alternatives after aborted sternotomy at the time of surgical aortic valve replacement in the TAVI era-Five centre experience and systemic review. Int J Cardiol 2016;223:1019-1024. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Idrees J, Roselli EE, Raza S, et al. Aborted sternotomy due to unexpected porcelain aorta: Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement offer an alternative choice? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;149:131-134 . Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Merlo A, Chen K, Deo S, Markowitz A, et al. Does routine preoperative computed tomography imaging provide clinical utility in patients undergoing primary cardiac surgery. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2017;25:659-662. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Rajah P, Schoenhagen P. The role of computed tomography in pre-procedural planning of cardiovascular surgery and intervention. Insights Imaging 2013;4:671-689. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. De Hartog-Dikhoff MJ, Overweg LN, Stooker W. The role of preoperative chest CT scan in cardiac surgical patients. Vasc Med Surg 2017;5:4. doi: 10.4172/2326-6925.1000332 Go to original source...
  14. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1597-1607. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.